Consulting in the libraries of developments in law works we can see that there are many essays on the major concepts such as justice, framed under the general heading the race, at least until recently, called Philosophy of Law. In particular today I saw one that caught my anteción by its title "cordial Justice" (Trotta) of the prestigious professor of philosophy Adela Cortina . The new Cortina thesis based on his theory of ethics Dobsonfly (made some years ago) ends with - in my opinion - a grand delcaraciones disasters such as "we need a global justice" which is to say "all love nocesitamos" or something like that.
pregeunta or begs the questions: que'hablan What these philosophers? What is being proposed from the chairs, in theory, are commissioned to create great legal argumetnación schemes? "Phrases like this? "Gaps to fill other gaps?
At this time, now that we have seen that this idea of \u200b\u200bglobal takes no more than that, for now, crisis and opacity (do not know who's boss, or whether it is responsible or not) that people - real target of rules and justice - which is interested in the concrete. Do not want a global justice, wants the City to return the amount of the penalty nullified , wants the builder to replace the screws in good quality Chinese SCREWS Bilbao, cheaper, answer for the destruction of the home.
This is not relegated putting major commitments minutiae. Quite the opposite, ignoring the real needs of the jsuticia going to "abstract" modern Type "globalize" is sacrificing people to change to devise a "perfect world" (which only fit their concepts, of course).
