Tuesday, June 29, 2010

Shop Opening Invitation Card

Inspire " points "economic value

recently
Litigation Division of the Superior Court of Justice Madrid I admitted a appeal against a traffic ticket with a value well below the 18,000 euros that the law requires minimum amount of the issue as to access the second instance court.

The fine in question was combined with the loss of 2 points , which led to section 2 of the said Supreme Court of Madrid to understand that the lawsuit was undetermined amount and admit - , is one of the exceptions to the posted limit - the appeal. The statement points to respect that " we are dealing with an appeal for an undetermined amount given that the penalty imposed is not only monetary, but involves the loss of 2 points from driving."

This line - contained in the Judgement No.. 160/2010 of 21 January - has not been followed yet another Section, the 1st, in the same room. That section, in two subsequent resolutions, the Autos 60/2010 and 59/2010 , both of 8 February, declared inadmissible the appeals mñinomo not lead to a value required by law and that a Although cuestiñon fines will imply the loss of points. The opinion of the Section 1 of this is that points do have economic value: the rechabilitación course in the worst case, when you back all the penalties must realziar to recover. A amount is less, by far, the minimum required for the appeal .
Well, by now you are two to one. We'll see what doctrine succeeds and what safeguards. The truth is that it supports the appeal is in my opinion more successful from the point of view of the right to defense. The other two decisions seem designed to prevent something like that " minor issues" can colpasar the work of the higher courts.

0 comments:

Post a Comment